11.22.07
Happy Thanksgiving
“Everyone capable of thanksgiving is capable of salvation and eternal joy,” Fr. Alexander Schmemann.
Stem Cell Breakthrough
A very good article can be found at:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/20/healthscience/stem.php
08.03.07
Siloam
“As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, ‘Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?’ ‘Neither this man nor his parents sinned,’ said Jesus, ‘but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life. As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.’ Having said this, he spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man’s eyes. ‘Go,’ he told him, ‘wash in the Pool of Siloam’ (this word means Sent). So the man went and washed, and came home seeing” John 9:1-6
A few months back I had been reflecting on the above passage in John and considering why it was that Jesus healed the blind man with clay and washing in water. Surely Christ could have simply spoken or touched the man with his hands or any number of methods simpler and less mysterious. But, it seems Christ was conveying some message through the use of these materials.
After meditating on this for a little while, what I took to be the meaning of Christ’s actions I was hoping to find supported in the Fathers. Oddly enough, awhile back, the same week the above passage from John 9 appeared in the lectionary, I ran into the below passage from St. Irenaeus when nearing the end of his masterful work “Against the Heresies” (or, the title I am quite fond of which St. Irenaeus uses to refer to his work: “The Refutation and Overthrowal of Knowledge Falsely So-Called”). I was pleased to see that what I had seen in John’s gospel was also seen by this great Father. Of course, having found a good treatment of the passage there is little need for me to offer my own exegesis; I will simply post his the superior commentary below.
Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 5, Chap. XV:
“And therefore, when His disciples asked Him for what cause the man had been born blind, whether for his own or his parents’ fault, He replied, ‘Neiter hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.’ Now the work of God is the fashioning of man. For, as the Scripture says, He made [man] by a kind of process: ‘And the Lord took clay from the earth,and formed man.’ Wherefore also the Lord spat on the ground and made clay, and smeared it upon the eyes, pointing out the original fashioining [of man], how it was effected, and manifesting the hand of God to those who can understand by what [hand] man was formed out of the dust. For that which the artificer, the Word, had omitted to form in the womb, [viz., the blind man's eyes], He then supplied in public, that the works of God might be manifested in him, in order that we might not be seeking out another hand by which man was fashioned, nor another Father; knowing that this hand of God which formed us at the beginning, and which does form us in the womb, has in the last times sought us out who were lost, winning back His own, and taking up the lost sheep upon His shoulders, and with joy restoring it to the fold of life . . . . For the Lord who formed the visual powers is He who made the whole man, carrying out the will of the Father. And inasmuch as man, with respect to that formation which was after Adam, having fallen into transgreession, needed the laver of regeration (that is, baptism), [the Lord] said to him [upon whom He had conferred sight], after He had smeared his eyes with the clay, ‘Go to Siloam, and wash;’ thus restoring to him both [his perfect] confirmation, and that regeneration which takes place by means of the laver. And for this reason when washed he came seeing, that he might both know Him who had fashioned him, and that man might learn [to know] Him who has conferred upon him life.”
08.01.07
The Body of Christ and Gender Issues
Jesus was fully male. Most importantly, for our discussion here, Jesus had and has a male body. Since His ascension (and even before) He has given us His very Body, of which we have the privilege to become a part of. Yet His Body, the Church, is everywhere referred to in feminine terms as She, Her, Mother, Bride, etc. How is it that we can talk of the Body of Christ both as male and female?
Let us recall God’s creating Eve from the rib of Adam. Eve was taken from Adam’s side; her body was literally Adam’s body; Adam could look upon Eve and truly say that she is “flesh of my flesh.” Despite this commonness of body, there was, nevertheless, male Adam and female Eve. (In fact, what bodily differences did exist, existed to allow for the becoming of one flesh, so they could actually be more unified and of one body than if they did not possess those differences). So it is with the new Adam, Christ. The old Adam’s flesh was male, and the new Adam’s flesh is male. The old Adam’s bride was truly flesh of his flesh, and the new Adam’s bride is truly flesh of his flesh. The old Adam’s bride was truly female, and the new Adam’s bride is truly female.
St. Paul touches on these issues in the famous passage of Ephesians 5:25-32:
“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church.”
Here we see that the mystery of the unity between Christ and His church is bound up in the unity between husband and wife. Each pair becomes and is one flesh, and to love the other is to love one’s own body precisely because the other is one’s own body and self. Yet these unions are without confusion between bride and bridegroom. While husband and wife become truly one flesh, we never forget who is the husband and who is the wife. So it is with Christ and the church that while we are one body we do not forget that Christ is the bridegroom and we are the bride.
Of course much more could be said of the passage from Ephesians and of the imagery being discussed, but I’ll leave that for you to meditate on and, hopefully, for us all to experience.
07.24.07
The Church in the N.T. and Today
The pope’s recent comments regarding the status of certains churches as such has sparked reactions from disgust to, “Ok, so what?” I have no interest in either defending or attacking the pope’s remarks (see this post’s comments for statements from Metropolitan Kyrill and Timothy George), but I am interested in addressing a bit of what I have heard from some responding Protestants. Protestants who I have talked that are off-put by the latest papal remarks usually start out by commenting on the priggishness of the pope thinking only Roman Catholics are the true church and everyone else is wrong. The “pride” of the Roman See is contrasted with the seemingly humble Protestant stand that no one church is right or perfect and we therefore must include all churches as legitimate churches (provided they are not among certain Prots who exclude the R.C.C. as a legitimate church). Catholics and Orthodox are quite aware that the members of the Church are fallible sinners; the Church itself exists precisely for sinners. However, they will also ascribe lofty language to the Church to the confusion of many Protestants. Below I just want to take a glance at an exceptionally brief list of New Testament verses on the Church, and perhaps this will help understand some of this high language must be present in the Church that takes the Scriptures seriously for it is the very language of Scripture. (Please forgive my redundant commentary. We, myself included, too often gloss over the grandeur of what’s being said).
Col. 1:24 “. . . for the sake of His body, which is the church.”
1 Cor. 12:12 “For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ.”
Eph. 5:25-32 “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church.”
Eph. 1:22-23 “And He put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.”
-We are quite familiar with the church as the Body of Christ, but even more explicit, “the FULLNESS of Him who fills all in all.”
Mt. 16:18-19 “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”
Mt. 18:17-18 “And if he refused to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector. Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”
The keys given to Peter in Mt. 16 are here in 18 the whole church’s, and what a weighty responsibility.
John 16:13 “However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth.”
1 Tim. 3:15 “I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.”
-Just as in Matthew we see keys given to an apostle in chapter 16 (and arguably to all the apostles) it is a task ascribed to “the church” in chapter 18 (also demonstrating the identity of the church is very much bound up in being under the apostles and those they appointed as successors) we see in John 16 a promise given to the apostles that they’ll be led into all truth, and then 1 Timothy says the Church is the very foundation of truth (for it is led by the Holy Spirit through the apostles and those who follow in apostolic doctrine into all truth -not 20,000 plus denominations).
Eph. 3:8-11 “To me (Paul), who am less than the least of all the sainst, this grace was given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to make all see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ; to the intent that now the manifold
wisdom of God might be made known by the church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places, according to the eternal purpose which He accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
-The very intent of the mystery hidden in God from the beginning of ages was that the wisdom of God might be made known by the church even to the angels and heavenly creatures.
The Church, though full of fallible members, is the pillar and ground of truth; it is full of those who sin against the Body of Christ, yet the Church is the spotless Body of Christ; one of its founders (Paul) calls himself the chief of all sinners and less than the least of all the saints, yet he tells his readers that he has become their spiritual father and that they ought to follow his example, not to mention he wrote several documents considered infallible; the keys of the Kingdom are given to one who did not yet understand that Christ had to die, would be called Satan, and would deny Christ three times (he too would write infallible Scripture).
This is nothing new, the Christian life is one lived in tension, juxtaposition, and paradox. The Creator became a creature, eternity entered temporality, the Impassible suffered, the Life-Giver died on a Cross, and now we who are in Christ are sinners but saints, in this world but dead to it, chasing life only to lose it but dying only to find it. There is no nice neat way to parse out how and when to ascribe certain terms to particular persons at specific times. We have to live in and through the tensions and wrestle with them. We are the people of the already but the not yet who strive to become what we are.
The mere fact that one lives with these tensions doesn’t necessarily mean they’re orthodox, but I would say that the failure to acknowledge the paradox is heterodox (not orthodox). The fact that most Protestant ecclesiologies have no room for one, holy, catholic, apostolic church, a spotless bride, the pillar and foundation of truth, demonstrates a failure to acknowledge the full reality of the Church. Orthodox and Catholics are fully aware of the Church being for fallible, fractured, sinners, but they also take into account the other glorious descriptions and definitions given to the Church in Scripture (not to mention Scripture is itself a collection of works that the Church had the task of deciding upon).
We who are the members of the Body of Christ so often fail to do deeds worthy of the Body of Christ, but our sins cannot make Christ a sinner, our foolishness cannot take away Christ’s wisdom, and even when we nail Him to a cross He makes the shame His glorification, the evil (deicide) a good (salvation for creation).
07.14.07
Preach the Gospel at All Times; If Necessary, Use Words
This week I was speaking to a Baptist lady at work who told me she was reading a book about “witnessing.” As I skimmed the back cover and table of contents I could see that it was all about strategies for presenting the gospel and how to broach the subject. There is nothing wrong with that in itself, in fact, it is a noble effort to think through ways of speaking about the faith. However, I would like to take a moment to think about non-verbal “witnessing.”
In Greek, the word “witness” is the same word for “martyr” (martys). It originally referred to those who gave testimony in court, but Christians specifically labled those killed on Christ’s behalf as “witnesses.” How do we who are not being killed then witness? By “presenting our bodies as living sacrifices” (Rom. 12:1). One of the most explicit New Testament exhortations to speak about Christ to those who ask is in the midst of Peter talking about being persecuted: “But even if you should suffer because of righteousness, blessed are you. Do not be afraid or terrified with fear of them, but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts. Always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks for a reason for your hope, but do it with gentleness and reverence, keeping your conscience clear, so that, when you are maligned, those who defame your good conduct in Christ may themselves be put to shame. For it is better to suffer for doing good, if that be the will of God, than for doing evil” (1 Pet. 3:14-17). For as much thought as we put into the answer we give for the hope that is in us, we must put at least as much prayer, fasting, and ascetic discipline into cultivating a gentleness and reverence in which to present that answer. For if we do not have a “right spirit” our teaching will not lead to conversion (or if it does it will be in spite of us), as the Psalm says: “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me. Cast me not away from your presence; and take not your holy spirit from me. Restore unto me the joy of your salvation; and uphold me with your free spirit. Then will I teach transgressors your ways; and sinners shall be converted unto you” (Ps. 50:10-13, Ps. 51:10-13 LXX).
This week I was reading “Liturgy and Life” by Fr. Alexander Schmemann wherein he makes some interesting and important comments about raising children in the faith. One of those comments was that church should be the first place children hear the word “God.” He writes, “In a classroom it is difficult to understand, it remains abstract; but in church it is ‘in its own element.’” In the context of our present discussion about “witnessing” to those outside the church we must keep this difficulty in mind. Without being able to transport the whole atmosphere of church to the highways and byways the least we must do to give Him of whom we witness any concreteness and context is have a right spirit, be a living sacrifice, a continual martyr.
MCO
07.11.07
The Kingdom, Baptism, and Children
After hearing Peter preach on the feast of Pentecost many asked, “What shall we do?” Peter responded, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). Here, some fundamentalists stop reading and say, “Children cannot repent, and they have nothing to repent of, so baptism is not for them.”
But let us take John the Baptist’s declaration, “Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” (Mt. 3:2). And then let’s compare that with a paraphrase of Peter’s direction above: Repent for your baptism is at hand. No fundamentalist would look at the first statement and say that children should be denied the kingdom because repentance does not pertain to them. So why deny children baptism in the latter statement, binding on the same basis one is loosing? Even if one does not accept the paraphrase, the reasoning behind it is the same: no one would force the criteria of being repentant, having faith, doing good works, etc, upon a child for admittance into the kingdom, so why do so with baptism? The reason is because some theologies are afraid of sacramental understandings of sacraments!, and have reduced mysteries like baptism to a mere declaration of one’s faith or something similar. Without action from God in the sacrament, all of the responsibility is hoisted upon the human participant, and if he is not of age to really be responsible, to understand, to put forth faith or repentance, then what is the point? Maintaining such a desacralized position leads to inconsistent applications of reason when interpreting Scripture, as seen above.
Jesus says in John 3:5: “Most assuredly I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.” In Matthew 18:3 He also says, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are coverted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” Here are two prerequisites for entering the kingdom according to Jesus, baptism and becoming as children. Just as children are the ones of whom “such is the kingdom of heaven,” they are also the prime candidates for baptism. Peter tells us to repent and be baptized for it is through repentance that adults become like children. “Repent” and “be converted” both have the same sense of turning around, of becoming something new. (Their connection is evidenced in Peter’s phrase, “Repent and be converted” (Acts 3:19)). Peter says to “repent and be baptized,” and Christ says to be “converted and become as little children” (some translations simply say “turn and become as little children”). We need to repent (turn around) and be converted (be turned) and become as little children to really be prepared for baptism (not that we’re ever fully prepared), and in being baptized truly become children: “But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” (Jn. 1:12-13). Later in John 3 Jesus describes being “born again,” literally “born from above” (i.e., from God), in the context of baptism: according to Christ we are born again, or born from above, by being “born of water and the Spirit.” It is in this being born of God that we become children of God.
Finally, let us read the entire answer Peter gave to the thirsting crowd at the feast of Pentecost: “Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call” (Acts 2:38-39). Too many stop reading at v. 38 while the very next verse tells us that the promise of baptism (remission of sins and the gifts of the Holy Spirit) is “to you and to your children.” Not only that but it is to “as many as the Lord our God will call,” and our Lord is the one who called, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven” (Mt. 19:14).
MCO
07.05.07
On Christ’s Baptism
–St. Gregory of Nyssa: “Jesus enters the filthy (sinful) waters of the world and when He comes out, brings up (purifies) the entire world with Him.”–
In our meditation on Christ’s baptism, let us begin with a consideration of water itself. Alexander Schmemann notes three essential dimensions of water. Water is seen as:
1-Life. It is the primary matter of which the Spirit moves upon from the very beginning (Gen. 1:2), and from which He drew up the land and all creation.
2-Death and destruction. This is seen in the flood Noah was saved from, the submerging of the Egyptians in Exodus, etc.
3. Purification. This is witnessed in John’s baptism, and Christ’s own, and even in Old Testament washings for un-cleanliness and such.
In these three dimensions we then see creation, fall, and redemption, we see life, death, and resurrection. Interestingly, water is simultaneously a principle of life and death, just as the cross now is. Also interesting is that when Christ goes to the Jordan and to the Cross we see these activities as unfit for Him. John the Baptist sees that Christ is not in need of repentance or purification, and Pontius Pilate sees that Christ is not a criminal deserving punishment or death. Yet Jesus insists to John that baptizing Him must be done to fulfill all righteousness, and to Peter that He must be crucified and to prevent Him would be a work of Satan.
The feast celebrating Christ’s Baptism is called “Theophany,” or “Epiphany.” Both of these names refer to the revelation of God at Christ’s Baptism. We essentially look to the revelation of the Trinity there as Christ is in the river, the Father speaks, and the Spirit descends. What else is revealed? The other revelations I want to highlight have to do with the Spirit’s descending. We could note that this reveals further Christ (i.e., “anointed one”) as Messiah, Who is anointed with the Holy Spirit. But there are two parallels to the Old Testament here. First, why did the Holy Spirit descend in the form of a dove? Think of the dove that came to Noah (interestingly with a olive branch: the oil of anointing) after he and his family were “saved through water” (1 Pet. 3:20) and is the symbol of peace, forgiveness, and reconciliation. The dove form recalls the story of Noah, and St. Peter himself makes the parallel between Noah’s family being “saved through water” and baptism “which now saves us” (1 Pet. 3:20-21). God again is offering us peace, forgiveness, and reconciliation. The second parallel recalls Scripture a bit prior to Noah. Indeed the Holy Spirit is the “Spirit of Christ,” as the New Testament says, so, why reveal and emphasize His “resting” upon Christ at Baptism? Think again to the water. Here we see the Spirit again descend and “move upon the waters” as He did in the beginning (Gen. 1:2). This reveals that the new creation is upon us, and that it is in Christ that this restoration takes place. The cosmos is restored to what it was always meant to be: the life of man and the communion between God and man (Schmemann). Adam partook of the one thing not given for communion; he wanted the thing in itself, apart from God; but apart from God there is no life and thus Adam died. But, in the new Adam, all things are again given to us as gifts from God blessed to be partaken of (hence Peter’s dream of all foods being made pure and allowed for consumption). And in a very special sense, in the waters of Baptism, we commune with God, i.e., we “put on Christ.” Let us remember the similarities noted earlier between Christ’s Crucifixion and Christ’s Baptism. On the Cross Christ united death to Himself Who is Life, thus making death the very servant of life/Life. Death has lost its sting and is now our passage to life more fully (”to die is to gain”). One could say that on His Cross Christ united Himself with death, so that our death is no longer destruction but a passage into life/Life. In like fashion one could say that in His Baptism Christ united Himself with the waters so that our baptism is no longer merely baptism in water but a baptism in Him. Indeed this is why in baptism we “put on Christ.” And this is also why Baptism is our death. In this world Christ is crucified (Pascal). To live in Christ is to die with Him to “this world” (of sin and death). There is no other life revealed to us but that of taking up our cross daily. We live by offering up our life everyday; and by losing our life for His sake we find it. Let us take two similar lines from St. Paul:
“As many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27).
“As many as have been baptized into Christ have been baptized into His death” (Rom. 6:3).
St. Paul tells us that entrance into Christ’s death is inextricably linked to putting on Christ; we have put on Christ Who is crucified, and thus our putting on Christ is our putting on crucifixion (so that we may be risen as Christ is in the new life in Christ).
Let us also look at Mt. 20:22-23: “Are you able to drink the cup that I am about to drink, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?” They said to Him, “We are able.” So he said to them, “You will indeed drink My cup, and be baptized with the baptism I am baptized with.”
Here Christ speaks of His upcoming death as a cup, for He drank it willingly, and as baptism, for He was immersed in it. Christ tells the Sons of Zebedee that they will be baptized with the baptism He is baptized with, which is death. St. Paul tells us that baptism into Christ is baptism into Christ’s death (which is Christ’s baptism, in Christ’s own words above). And just as Christ describes His death as baptism due to His immersion into it, so Paul describes the immersing action of baptism as our being “buried with [Christ] through baptism into death, in order that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life” (Rom. 6:4-5). In Paul there is no such notion of symbol being distinct from reality. The immersion is not only a sign of our death, it is our death and burial in all actuality. The symbol truly reveals the reality, communicates the reality, is the reality, and fulfills the reality (Schmemann). The symbol and reality coincide as the purpose of one is precisely to be the other. This is because, as noted before, we are in the restored creation made new in Christ. Creation is restored to being what it was always meant to be: a means of communion with God. In baptism we see the first fruits of this newness of life.
Furthermore, Christ speaks to the Sons of Zebedee as to future martyrs. The Greek word for martyr is literally “witness.” As Fr. Schmemann writes: “The martyrs were witnesses: witnesses of the transformation of death . . . the first Christian martyr, Stephen, as he was dying, said: ‘I see heaven opening.’ He witnessed death becoming life. The ‘birthday’ of the martyrs are celebrated by the Church on their death days; on that day they were ‘born.’” The martyrs witness death becoming life, and we, the baptized, witness this. Baptism is our birth into that new life, the life in death. As Christ says, “I tell you the truth, no one can enter the Kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit” (John 3:5). In baptism, our second birth (our being born again, or, literally, born from above) is our first death, and our first death is our birth to the new life in Christ, wherein, if we shall persevere to end in living crucified, in taking up our cross daily, in being ever dead to sin, we shall be ever alive to Christ and our second death will not be to our destruction or condemnation. “He that overcomes shall not be hurt of the second death” (Rev. 2:11). It is from this perspective that we can see martyrdom as the culmination of the life of the baptized.
Let us praise Christ Who restored creation, Who made death life, Who made the waters no longer a realm of death, destruction, or demons, but a place of meeting with God. Let us praise Christ who called fishermen out of the water that when they returned to water they saw the Lord calm the squalls of a storm and even walk upon the waves. Let us praise Christ who turned the water to wine and continues to turn water to our grave, to our life, to the waters of baptism.
MCO
07.03.07
Peter and the Thief
“We have to know God in a godly manner and speak about Him accordingly. Thus only those who are free from the anxiety and constraint of their own will and have given themselves over to the will of God can move about at their ease in the testimony to the truth, moved in a place of freedom, beyond all anguish, by the Spirit of God Himself.
The Apostle Peter’s bravado is a transient illusion, powerless before the temptations of life. The big brave man falters when faced with a servant-girl. The thief was not afraid because he was crucified. Peter denied Christ because he feared crucifixion. The free man is the man who is crucified. A dead man does not fear death. No one can lose what he does not have. No one who has security can know God. No one who has worldly defences, like Peter, can believe. Inevitably, with curses and oaths he will confess the truth–that he does not know Christ. Then, after this painful process of self-emptying and feeling of total ignorance, will come weeping, contrition and grace. From then on, the sun will rise and faith will blossom. Worn out by much weeping like a baby child, Peter becomes once again the rock of faith.”
–taken from HYMN OF ENTRY by Archimandrite Vasileios, pp. 93-94